Comment on the letter by Hughes et al

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comment on study by Backman et al

BfArM acknowledges the submission of the manuscript by Backman et al. (2005) concerning the occurrence of breast cancer associated with Mirena use. The manuscript was scheduled for publication in October 2005 and meanwhile has been published (Backman T. et al. Use of the Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and breast cancer. Obstet and Gynecol 2005;106:813-7). Unfortunately, the study ...

متن کامل

Comment on Article by Celeux Et Al

The authors point to several problems occurring if DIC = 2D(θ) − D(θ) is applied to missing data models: (i) the focus of the model depends on whether the missing data z are considered as observations or as parameters or integrated out; (ii) the parameter θ may be non-identifiable; (iii) θ can be a poor estimator of θ. They then investigate modifications of DIC mainly based on estimates other t...

متن کامل

Comment on Yuan Et Al

It has come to our attention that the work of Yuan et al. [1] is being represented as definitive regarding the existence of a particular nonstrange, isoscalar, spin three dibaryon, d * , which we [2] , among others [3, 4, 5, 6, 8] , have proposed exists. We therefore wish to comment on this paper and its relation to ours and those of others. In our work [2] , the d * dibaryon is constructed in ...

متن کامل

Rebuttal to the Formal Comment on Schorr et al. (2014) submitted by Tyack et al. (2015)

Tyack et al. cite three specific concerns in their commentary regarding Schorr et al. [1], and we respond briefly to them here. Quotes around normal font designate text from their commentary; italicized text in quotes is from the original paper [1]. Tyack et al. state that readers may misinterpret findings in Schorr et al. [1] because they aren’t “. . .adequately appreciating that that some of ...

متن کامل

Comment on the correspondence by Cokol et al.

The correspondence by Cokol et al (2007) confirms a previous finding that some journals with a high impact factor (IF) publish more retractions than those with a low IF (Liu, 2006f). Their explanation is that high-IF journals receive more scrutiny from the scientific community, and that therefore more publications are identified as flawed and subsequently retracted. Equally, they argue, low-IF ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Arthritis & Rheumatism

سال: 1990

ISSN: 0004-3591,1529-0131

DOI: 10.1002/art.1780330427